Sorting through lending costs

Although the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the federal agency created to oversee mortgage lending, only recently opened, the Bureau started looking at ways to protect consumers during the loan-shopping period long before it’s official start date.

Making sense of the story

The bureau is exploring avenues for combining the two forms that borrowers currently receive – the three-page Good Faith Estimate and the two-page Truth in Lending Act form. These forms tell would-be borrowers the terms of their loan – for instance, how payments on an adjustable-rate mortgage change. They also lay out fees.

Fees can make a big difference when comparison shopping. The simplest way to compare loans is by looking at the Annual Percentage Rate, or A.P.R. That calculation rolls in fees as well as the stated interest rate. Because lenders are required to follow the same formula, useful comparisons can be made.

Borrowers are advised to request a Good Faith Estimate from every lender they approach. While the Good Faith Estimate is in place to help borrowers, according to one lender, some lenders may provide interest-rate quotations that expire almost instantaneously, making it difficult for buyers to comparison shop.

Borrowers should be wary if they receive two or three different Good Faith Estimates and there is a difference of several thousand dollars.
Read the full story New York Times

Homeowners who want to trade up are stuck waiting

Before the bust, rising prices fueled the housing market, enabling buyers to start small and climb the ladder. Now that promise of upward mobility has been all but shattered, gumming up the market.

“The idea that you move up, and that it is automatically a good investment… (Jae C. Hong, Associated Press)

August 01, 2011|By Alejandro Lazo, Los Angeles Times

Back in the frothy days of 2007, Luciano Mor needed only a weekend and a Craigslist ad to find a buyer for his two-bedroom starter home.

The split-level house, on a quiet Silver Lake street, sold for $749,000, commanding nearly twice what he paid in 2002 and about $50,000 more than a real estate agent had suggested as a listing price. Mor, who works for Vans’ apparel division, had planned on taking the gains and snapping up a place closer to his job in Cypress with enough room to accommodate an expanding family.
It was the kind of life progression that traditionally fuels a healthy housing market. Then prices started to drop. Nearly four years later, Mor is still looking for the right deal.

“I just feel like the longer I hold off, the better I will be,” Mor said, sitting in the living room of the Long Beach home he and his wife rent. “It’s almost like getting a new car — you just know it’s best to hold on to your old car as long as possible.”

Potential move-up buyers like the Mors are largely sitting on the sidelines these days, leaving a key part of the housing market stuck in neutral. The promise of rising prices and upward mobility, once a powerful force in the American housing narrative, has been all but shattered by the downturn.

“The move-up market is a conveyor belt, and everyone moves up a rung, but that has kind of gotten gummed up during the housing recession,” said Stan Humphries, chief economist of the real estate website Zillow.

Although there is no way to precisely to track move-up buyers, such shoppers often are looking in the $300,000-to-$800,000 price range, according to San Diego real estate research firm DataQuick.

Home sales fell the most in that category in June, dropping 25.5% from June 2010, mainly because buyer tax credits last year sparked so many first-time purchases, DataQuick said. All those first-time purchases fueled move-up transactions.

By comparison, sales of homes priced below $200,000 fell 11.4% from June 2010, and sales of homes priced at more than $800,000 dropped 17.6%.

Before the bust, moving up was so common that chains of buyers and sellers would develop, with each deal dependent on the previous one in the chain. Move-up buyers are a key part of a more robust market, as all that trading up fuels price gains and helps homeowners to build equity.

“It is critical,” said Ed Leamer, director of the UCLA Anderson Forecast. “The way to think about is a chain of trades that normally occurs, and if that chain is broken at any point, or it doesn’t begin because you don’t have enough entry-level buyers, then the whole dynamic of the marketplace is affected and the level of resales is going to be very small.”

Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, said the move-up market got out of hand during the boom, with too many people taking on more debt than they could afford. Even in a more normal market, moving up is not necessarily the best option for homeowners who could put their money to use in other places.
“For the longest time, people took it for granted that prices would go up, and, particularly over the last decade, they assumed prices would go up fairly rapidly,” he said. “The idea that you move up, and that it is automatically a good investment — that is crazy, and if people think more clearly about what they want to do, that is going to lead to making better decisions.”

People appear to be thinking carefully about their next housing moves, said Beryl Henry, a Lakewood real estate agent who remembers that chains as long as seven weren’t unusual before the bust. These days, her sellers are more likely to be scaling down rather than trading up.

“I personally am not seeing the move-up buyer,” Henry said. “I don’t remember the last time I have even seen a chain of three.”

Some homeowners are afraid to look for something bigger or better because of high unemployment, a shaky economic recovery and the fear that prices have yet to stabilize. Many can’t get a mortgage that would cover the cost of a move-up home. And others are “underwater” on their mortgages, having watched housing prices fall so far that their homes wouldn’t sell for enough money to pay off their debt.

The declining real estate market and poor economy in Northern California’s Shasta County have kept Michael Cox, 40, and his wife, Carrie, 35, from moving out of their first home, a three-bedroom, two-bath house they bought in 2003. Shasta County was hit hard by the recession and continues to suffer in the recovery, with the unemployment rate standing at 15% in June.

“We had more kids,” Cox said. “We just wanted to upgrade and move up to that next level like everybody else does.”

The couple put their home on the market in 2008 but got no takers. They aren’t underwater and can afford their mortgage payments. For now, they are simply stuck.
The Los Angeles Times

Homebuyer contracts falling apart

Debt ceiling gridlock, pending short sales, appraisal problems causing homebuyers to walk away: brokers

July 29, 2011 01:30PM

By Kenneth R. Harney
Are homebuyers walking away in droves from the contracts they’ve signed? Or are they essentially fouling out of the game, unable to close deals because of financing and credit issues?

Whatever the answer, this much appears to be certain: exceptionally large numbers of signed real estate contracts fell apart last month, failing to reach settlement. According to the National Association of Realtors, one of every six real estate agents polled in June reported having signed contracts canceled before closing — up from just one in 25 the month before. The typical monthly cancellations rate over the course of the past 16 months has ranged in a narrow band between 8 percent and 10 percent.

What’s going on here? Lawrence Yun, the chief economist of NAR, said the sudden spike is surprising and worrisome, and that there are no hard statistics available on the causes. The most likely suspects, Yun said, are lowball appraisals and tough mortgage underwriting rules that knock buyers out of contracts through mortgage contingency clauses.

But a series of interviews with real estate brokers around the country suggests that there may be other, subtler forces at work that are busting up real estate deals.

Buyers’ confidence about the direction of the national economy has been badly rattled in the last six to eight weeks by the ongoing gridlock in Congress over raising the national debt ceiling and cutting the deficit. That, in turn, brokers say, is making buyers less willing to risk a major purchase, making them pickier and more demanding when defects are found in home inspections, and frequently is leading to contract cancellations for relatively minor reasons.

Jessika Mayer, manager of professional development at Coldwell Banker Plaza Real Estate in Wichita, Kan., said she is seeing more well-qualified buyers — who would have proceeded to closing in past months — suddenly “feeling very worried and uncertain because they don’t know” if the country is headed for an economic disaster that would make their new purchase difficult to sustain.

Chad Ochsner, broker-owner of RE/MAX Alliance, a 20-office firm based in Denver, said his agents are also “seeing buyers feeling remorse” and unusual trepidation because of national economic uncertainties. As a result, he said, “they’re terminating contracts that in the past would have gone to closing.”

Inspections almost always turn up problems of one type or another, Mayer said, “but lately buyers seem to be holding out for perfection.” Maybe the inspection report estimates the remaining useful life of an air conditioning system in a resale house to be two to three years. Or maybe a floor covering is worn and

should eventually be replaced. Whereas previously buyers who truly wanted a house might let those issues pass, now they want the contract price reduced in compensation or they want the replacement or repair made before closing. Some sellers are willing to negotiate but others feel the contract price on the house is as low as they can go. If the parties can’t bridge the gap, the whole deal disintegrates.

The surging numbers of pending short sales clogging local markets are another cause of contract cancellations, brokers say. Buyers negotiating with banks often wait months to get answers from the bank on their offer, triggering repeated time extensions on the contract terms. Eventually buyers lose patience, throw up their hands and say forget it.

Charlie Bengel Jr., CEO of RE/MAX Allegiance in Fairfax, Va., said that offices in Richmond, Va., and Annapolis, Md., report “a significant increase” in short-sale related cancellations, primarily because of buyer frustration with the “lengthy short sale process,” and “banks not approving short sales.”

Finally, appraisal problems in many parts of the country continue to bedevil real estate transactions, especially when inexperienced appraisers working for low fees overuse distressed property sales as comparables for non-distressed listings. For example, Rod Smith, director of general brokerage at Coldwell Banker Chicora in Myrtle Beach, S.C., said a recent signed contract on a condo blew up when an appraiser valued it far below the agreed-upon sales price. That price, Smith said, was well in line with recent sales of similar units.

A subsequent review of the appraisal report turned up numerous errors, but the buyers chose not to appeal, and pulled out of the contract after the lender urged them to refuse to pay the price they had previously agreed to.

“The realtor is trying to sell you a property at 40 percent over what it’s worth!” the lender reportedly told the buyers. No wonder they walked.

Ken Harney is a syndicated real estate columnist. The Real Deal Online

Mortgage rates are great, if you qualify

Interest rates are near historic lows and home prices are affordable; however, many borrowers are finding they must have nearly pristine credit records and hefty down payments to get the best rates.

Making sense of the story

Since 2009, credit standards have become much tighter. For borrowers, this emphasizes the importance of paying close attention to credit scores.

New rules unveiled last week, the result of last year’s Dodd-Frank financial-services legislation, require banks and other lenders to disclose to consumers the scores used to determine interest rates charged borrowers, or to deny credit, making it easier for borrowers to see how their credit scores affect the interest rates they pay.

The FICO credit scores on loans that banks are giving out and that are backed by government agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac show the new reality. Currently, the two agencies essentially finance 75 percent of all mortgages by purchasing the loans from banks, thus shaping how much it costs to borrow.

FICO scores range from 300 to 850. Prior to the decline in home prices, a score of 700 to 725 was considered solid and, a borrower could expect to be approved for a “conventional” mortgage at the lowest rates.

From 2003 to 2006, 82 percent of Fannie Mae mortgages were for borrowers with a score between 700 and 750, but so far in 2011, only 13 percent of Fannie Mae mortgages carry that score, and just 1.7 percent have a score of 700 to 725. This year, 75 percent of Fannie Mae mortgages are for FICO scores of 750 to 755, up from less than 5 percent before 2005.

These trends demonstrate the importance of understanding credit scores and ensuring credit reports are accurate. Consumers can check their credit report at AnnualCreditReport.com

Read the full story The Wall Street Journal

U.S. Tackles Housing Slump

The Obama administration is ramping up talks on how to revive the housing
market, which is weighing on the economic recovery.
Read the full story The Wall Street Journal

Secrets to getting a mortgage with so-so credit

Getting a mortgage can be tough these days – even people with near-perfect credit have been rejected for loans. But for some lucky borrowers, things aren’t as bad as the doom-and-gloom crowd says.

Read the full story CNN SmartMoney

Survey shows opposition to down payment requirements and elimination of

NAR’s ninth housing pulse survey reflects that, as the housing market continues to struggle, Americans worry that policy proposals coming out of Washington could drag the market down further or deter potential new homeowners.

There is particular concern surrounding calls for a required down payment of 20 percent on home purchases. Seven-in-ten Americans say requiring a down payment of 20 percent on the cost of a home would have a negative impact on the housing market. The survey also shows strong concern about the possible elimination of the home mortgage interest deduction. Two in every three Americans, oppose eliminating the home mortgage interest deduction as part of a plan to reduce the federal deficit. A majority of Americans (51 percent) strongly oppose eliminating it. Americans believe that either action would have severe consequences for the housing market.

The survey, which measures how affordable housing issues affect consumers, also found job security concerns remain high, with 61 percent of Americans saying that job layoffs and unemployment are a big problem in their area; eight in 10 cite these issues as a barrier to homeownership.

More info Realtor.org

REALTORS®: New loan limit would hurt home sales

Unless Congress takes action, the current loan limits will expire on Sept. 30 and the cost of a mortgage could rise significantly, especially in high-cost areas such as California.

More than 30,000 California families could face higher down payments, higher mortgage rates, and stricter loan qualification requirements if conforming loan limits on mortgages backed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac are reduced beginning October 1, 2011, according to analysis by the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.).

The conforming loan limit determines the maximum size of a mortgage that FHA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) can buy or guarantee.

Non-conforming or jumbo loans typically carry a higher mortgage interest rate than a conforming loan and require a higher down payment, increasing the monthly payment and negatively impacting housing affordability for California home buyers.

C.A.R. and the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (NAR) have long advocated making permanent higher conforming loan limits. As a result of C.A.R.’s and NAR’s efforts, in 2008, Congress temporarily raised the conforming loan limits from $417,000 to $729,750 and has extended them annually through fiscal year 2011.

To see the impact the lower limits would have on various regions throughout the state, please visit http://www.car.org/newsstand/newsreleases/2011newsreleases/loanlimits/.
Read the full story Orange County Register

NAR INSIGHTS: Purchases of U.S. Real Estate by International Clients

Foreign buyers of U.S. residential real estate have accounted for a small, slowly growing part of the U.S. existing- home sales market. NAR Research has been tracking trends … National Association of Realtors

Fixed mortgage rates touch new lows for 2011

NEW YORK — Fixed mortgage rates fell this week to the lowest point of the year, offering incentive for homeowners to save money by refinancing their loans. Read article » Mercury News.com